Do Big Yields Mean Big Money?

Do you believe the highest yields return the greatest profit? Are you managing for maximum yields? Do you attempt to manage your corn crop for the highest yields as a result of what yield contest winner’s say? Maybe you have heard that balancing soil cations are what you want to do, but you can’t afford over 500 lbs K2O/a so you go with a lower rate that is still much higher than recommended? If you have answered yes to any of these questions, you might be missing some profit!

Nutrient Management Considerations
The highest, or maximum yields do not necessarily correspond to the highest net returns. Accepting yields below the maximum in your area may be in your best interest. Let’s take a look at a replicated research project that compared nutrient application rates. This corn study in Minnehaha County compared cost-benefit ratios associated with different nutrient recommendation strategies (Table 1).

The highest yielding treatment was from the “Maximum” nutrient application strategy with 192.9 bu/a. However, the most profitable nutrient management strategy was the “N only” application, which had the lowest yield. A very close second, separated by only $0.83 net return was the university recommendations based on unbiased nutrient research calibration (SDSU Extension Fertilizer Recommendation Guide). Attempting to go after the maximum is not profitable with a loss of -$129.21 compared with “university” recommendations. The “What if?” treatment uses the yield from the “Maximum” treatment only to compare a “what if” scenario for nutrient rates more in line with what producers are doing in the field, which is $104.30/a nutrient cost; this “What if?” treatment still lost -$67.82 compared with the “university” recommendations.

The Bottom Line
The secret to profitable nutrient application is knowing how much to apply based on accurate field yield history and soil test knowledge. Nutrient rates should be based on sound university recommendations which do not include nutrient applications based on crop nutrient removal. In this research, soil test P, K, and Zn were in the “Very High” (VH) soil test category and therefore required no additional nutrient application. As our agricultural systems become more tested by economic bottom lines and environmental concerns, the importance of strict management of our nutrient resources cannot be overstated.

Source: Anthony Bly, iGrow

Recent News

Fall-applied Herbicides-What Goes Around Comes Around

Fall herbicide treatments have fallen off over the past several years for a couple of reasons, among them the effectiveness of new soybean trait systems for managing marestail, some generally crappy weather in late fall, and efforts to reduce input costs.  We are seeing a resurgence in some weeds, such as dandelion, which respond well […]

New Round of Farm Aid for COVID Losses Announced, and Causes Snag in Congressional Spending Bill

Andrew Restuccia and Jesse Newman reported in Friday’s Wall Street Journal that, “President Trump unveiled $13 billion in new aid to farmers facing economic harm from the coronavirus pandemic as he aimed to boost support among rural voters at a campaign rally. ‘I’m proud to announce that I’m doing even more to support Wisconsin farmers,’ said Mr. Trump, speaking outside […]

Corn Silage Needs Adequate Moisture to Ferment

Early season frost is challenging for corn silage producers, according to Karl Hoppe, Extension livestock systems specialist at NDSU’s Carrington Research Extension Center. Frost makes an abrupt end to the corn-growing season. This begins the dry-down period for the corn plants. “Good corn silage fermentation requires adequate moisture to reduce dry-matter loss and spoilage,” Hoppe […]

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now