Menu

Fall-Applied Herbicides: Which Weed Species Should be the Target?

Herbicides applied in the fall often can provide improved control of many winter annual weed species compared with similar applications made in the spring, according to a University of Illinois weed scientist.

Aaron Hager explained that marestail is one example of a weed species that is often better controlled with herbicides applied in the fall compared with the spring. “An increasing frequency of marestail populations in Illinois are resistant to glyphosate, and within the past year we have confirmed that resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides also is present in Illinois populations,” Hager said. “Targeting emerged marestail with higher application rates of products such as 2,4-D in the fall almost always results in better control at planting compared with targeting overwintered and often larger plants with lower rates of 2,4-D in the spring.”

One question typically posed is whether or not a fall application needs to include one or more herbicides that provide residual control of winter annual weed species. Hager said that typically the earlier the fall application is made (early October), the more benefit a soil-residual herbicide can provide since emergence of winter annual weeds is often not complete.

“However, delaying the herbicide application until later in the fall (mid-November) often diminishes the necessity of a soil-residual herbicide since most of the winter annual weeds have emerged and can be controlled with non-residual herbicides,” he said. “Applying a soil-residual herbicide late in the fall in hopes of having a clean field prior to planting is akin to gambling on the weather. Cold winter conditions (similar to last winter) can reduce herbicide degradation in the soil and increase herbicide persistence.

“This might not always be favorable since, depending on the residual herbicide, increased persistence also can cause injury to the following crop. A more moderate winter and early spring warming will increase herbicide degradation, which could result in the need for a burndown herbicide to control existing vegetation before planting,” he said.

Hager added that fall-applied herbicides that target fall-emerging winter annual species, biennials, and perennials are recommended. “We do not recommend fall application of residual herbicides for control of any spring-emerging annual weed species. We are aware that some labels suggest the product will control certain summer annual weed species, including pigweed (Amaranthus) species, following application in the fall,” he said.

According to Hager, the Extension weed science program at the U of I does not recommend fall application of residual herbicides to control Amaranthus species the next spring for the following reasons:

  • Inconsistent performance. Performance consistency of soil-residual herbicides applied in the fall is greatly dependent on weather and soil conditions after application, U of I data suggest the greatest and most consistent control of Amaranthus species either at planting or several weeks after planting was achieved when residual herbicides were applied in the spring, not in the fall.
  • Increased selection for herbicide-resistant biotypes. Soil-applied herbicides are not immune from selection for herbicide-resistant biotypes (see previous article.) Following a fall application, the concentration of herbicide remaining in the spring when Amaranthus species begin to germinate will be much lower compared with the same product rate applied closer to planting.

Populations of several of the most challenging summer annual broadleaf weed species in Illinois demonstrate resistance to herbicides from more than one site-of-action herbicide class, Hager said. “Their effective management requires an integrated approach that often includes soil-residual herbicides. Applying these herbicides when they will be most effective against these challenging summer annual species is a critical component of an integrated management program,” he added.

Source: University of Illinois

Recent News

Comparison of a Conventional Crop Rotation with an Organic Forage-Based Crop Rotation
7/6/2020

Due to continued increases in demand for certified organic grains, crop farmers that have transitioned from conventional to certified organic grains report higher net returns per acre (McBride et al., 2015; Greene et al., 2017; Greene and Vilorio, 2018; Center for Farm Financial Management, 2020).  Despite this, certified organic land accounts for less than 2 […]

USDA Announces Flexibilities for Producers Filing ‘Notice of Loss’ for Failed, Prevented Planted Acres
7/3/2020

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is providing additional flexibilities for producers to file on acres with failed crops or crops that were prevented from planting because of extreme weather events. USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) is adding these flexibilities for Notice of Loss on both insured and uninsured crops to enable Service Centers to best assist […]

China Imports Still Not on Pace to Meet Phase One Targets
7/2/2020

Earlier this week, Bloomberg News reported that, “China’s purchases of U.S. goods increased last month as the economy continued its recovery from the coronavirus shutdowns, but imports are still far behind the pace needed to meet the terms of the ‘phase one’ trade deal. “By the end of May this year, China had only bought about 19% of the […]

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now