Maximizing Return on Corn Nitrogen Investments

Cold, hot, dry, wet, early, late; Six words that both summarize and demonstrate the variability in spring planting conditions for the last several Michigan cropping seasons. Though uncertainty with spring weather may always exist, resources are available to reduce grower uncertainty when selecting corn nitrogen (N) rate applications. Seven states through the Corn Belt, including Michigan, have adopted the Maximum Return to Nitrogen (MRTN) corn N recommendation system.

The MRTN system was adopted to further enhance farm profitability by maximizing the economic return of N fertilizer invested while simultaneously addressing some of the negative environmental consequences that occur when applying excessive N rates. The system provides a range of N rate recommendations based on many years of corn yield data from N response trials conducted exclusively across a range of Michigan soils. What the MRTN system also recognizes and accounts for is that the most economically optimum nitrogen rate will never be a constant measure as both corn and fertilizer prices will fluctuate over time. The system provides a profitable range of N rates that allows for user input to adjust N rates based on crop rotation, soil productivity potential and current price of N fertilizer and corn grain.

The MRTN recommendation table is a summary of results from the Michigan database within the Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator. Both tools may be accessed via the Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management Program website at Michigan State University.

Using the MRTN recommendations
Michigan State University Extension recommends following these important notes when using MRTN recommendations.

  • The MRTN system is not an individual site-year recommendation system. Rather the system provides corn N recommendations that have proven profitable over many years, not just one, thus accounting for both optimal and sub-optimal growing seasons. Field-specific circumstances including excessive rainfall after early N applications or individual large rainfall events are not accounted for and may require adjustments to in-season N applications.
  • Corn yield for the N rates listed at the 0.05 price ratio will be near maximum levels, but N rates for higher price ratios may result in a greater economic return to the grower.
  • When the previous crop is soybean, the N credit is built into the recommendation system. Do not take any additional N credit as the rotational effect of soybean is already accounted for under the “previous crop” heading.
  • If the previous crop was a small grain that was interseeded with a leguminous cover crop species, growers should follow the recommendation category for previous crop soybean and small grain. If no leguminous cover crop was used with the small grain, growers should default to the recommendation category for previous crop corn.
  • The profitable range listed beneath suggested N rates can be used to adjust N rates based on an individual grower’s familiarity with a specific field (i.e., tendency to yield greater or less than expected), the amount of risk a grower wishes to assume, or locally important air, soil and water concerns.

 Source: Kurt Steinke, Michigan State University Extension – Dr. Steinke’s work is funded in part by MSU’s AgBioResearch.

Recent News

Expected Payments on ARC-CO and PLC

After the release of the January WASDE report, the Gardner ARC/PLC Payment Calculator was updated to reflect revised price information for the 2019 and 2020 years. Herein updated estimates of Agricultural Risk Coverage at the County Level (ARC-CO) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) are presented for corn, soybeans, and wheat. Overall, PLC payments in 2019 are not […]

Managing Stored Grain Through Winter

Managing stored grain throughout the winter is an important part of your grain marketing plan for farm profitability. This winter we are already receiving reports of stored grain going out of condition, which can lower the¬†value and be a hazard to those working around the grain facility. At a minimum, stored grain that has gone […]

Two Trade Deals and a Price Drop

The signing of the Phase 1 trade deal with China and approval in the Senate of the USMCA last week saw two positive developments on the trade front.  Despite some resolution on these trade issues, markets reacted negatively.  The USMCA, while providing stability with two major trading partners, held limited short-term upside potential for corn […]

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now