Menu

Planting Soybeans in Dry Conditions

Abnormally dry conditions in portions of the state may compel producers to reconsider planting depth for soybeans. While some areas have received much-needed moisture, outlooks still indicate dry soil conditions could be a concern. Soybeans must absorb nearly 50% of their seed weight in water before the germination process can begin. As a result, planting into soil with inadequate moisture may result in reduced or delayed emergence, which can affect final plant stands.

Proper Planting Depth
The typical recommended planting depth for soybeans is 1-1.5”. As a general rule, producers should try to plant into at least 0.5” of moisture. This may be a challenge in many of the soybean producing areas of South Dakota in 2015. In dry soil conditions, planting depths of up to 2” are acceptable. Planting deeper than 2” places the soybean seed at risk of running out of carbohydrate reserves prior to emergence, especially if a heavy rain crusts the soil surface. Coarse-textured soils and soils with a large amount of residue cover are less susceptible to crusting than bare, fine-textured soils. As always, producers should consider soil texture, tillage practices, and weather forecasts when determining optimum planting depth.

Equipment Considerations
Row-crop planters often provide better depth control than air seeders or drills although this depends a lot on the amount of residue present in the field. Another advantage of row-crop planters in dry conditions is the ability to use residue managers to move loose, dry soil away from the planting strip, essentially creating a ‘furrow’ which may allow for seed placement deeper into the soil profile while still only having 2” of soil on top of the soybean seed. Producers should consider that weather events such as high winds or heavy rain and even common production practices such as using a land roller may partially fill in the ‘furrow’ and result in a larger than intended depth of soil on top of the soybean seed.

Uneven Emergence
In many cases, despite the best precautions, soybean emergence may be uneven this year. Producers should evaluate both the cause for uneven emergence and the uniformity and density of stand before considering replanting. If seeds are whole and laying in dry soil, they will eventually germinate and fill in the stand when adequate moisture arrives. Final stand counts should not be performed until all viable seed has emerged. Soybean maturity is largely determined by photoperiod and late-emerging plants will be ready for harvest at the same time as early-emerging plants. Most research suggests that a uniform final stand of 80-100,000 plants per acre is enough to obtain expected yields. Producers can determine their stand by counting the number of plants in a length of row equal to 1/1000th of an acre  and multiplying by 1000.

Second Plantings?
If final stands are less than 80,000 or there are several bare spots in a field, a producer may want to ‘fill-in’ these areas with a row-crop planter. Keep in mind that adequate moisture must be present for these ‘fill-in’ soybeans to germinate and that the existing stand will be damaged by this process. The second planting will also have lower yield potential due to a later planting date. University research suggests that ‘filling-in’ does not increase yields over leaving existing stands if there are more than 66,000 plants per acre.

Source: Jonathan Kleinjan, South Dakota State University 

Recent News

USDA to Extend Flexibility on Crop Insurance Program
11/15/2019

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Risk Management Agency (RMA) today announced it will continue to defer accrual of interest for 2019 crop year insurance premiums to help the wide swath of farmers and ranchers affected by extreme weather in 2019. Specifically, USDA will defer the accrual of interest on 2019 crop year insurance premiums […]

The Conservation Question, Part 4-An Overview of Acres
11/15/2019

Throughout its history, conservation policy can be understood, in part, as representing attempts at achieving balance.  Policies have involved balancing the demands for producing crops with the limits of, and impacts on, natural resources; they have also tried to achieve different balances within production and among crops and land uses.  This article continues the discussion […]

Cost and Returns from Different Nitrogen Application Timing in Illinois
11/13/2019

Overall returns on Illinois grain farms are projected to be much lower in 2019 than recent years, resulting in more consumer about managing input costs. Fertilizer, seed, and pesticide costs represent a large portion of the total cost of producing corn, with fertilizer costs historically larger than seed and pesticide per-acre costs on high-productivity farmland […]

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now