Technology Makes Sidedressing Crops With Manure Easier

The late, wet spring that occurred across Central Michigan forced many farmers to reprioritize their normal spring schedule and condense field activities into as few days as possible. Gratiot County farmers James and Bob Weburg were among those farmers who normally plan to start field work in mid-April but were forced to wait until late May before weather and field conditions allowed getting crops in the ground. In a normal year Weburg Farms hauls manure from the farm’s swine finishing facility prior to planting corn. To save time this year, the cousins decided to plant corn then sidedress with manure once the crop was up. Fortunately they had previously purchased and had some experience with a spreader and injectors capable of sidedressing in standing crops.

In mid-June, Weburgs started sidedressing corn with manure. The farm employee operating the equipment reported that the GPS and automatic guidance used on the farm simplified and improved the process. The driver was able to set the tractor to follow the line previously established during planting. The tractor and manure spreader combined create a long piece of equipment. Any slight direction corrections by the tractor pulling the spreader are magnified at the rear of the spreader and have the potential to either cover the corn or till it out. Because the planting tractor was equipped with automatic guidance, rows were planted such that the tractor pulling the manure tank didn’t need to respond to row variation and the manure spreader was held straight. The operator reported slightly adjusting the line of the sidedress tractor to center the manure injectors between the rows. The small corn plants were not disturbed by the operation.

The Weburgs are also cooperating on a field trial facilitated by the Michigan State University Extension Nitrogen in the Environment work group. This trial is currently designed to compare nitrogen (N) provided by sidedress manure to 28 percent liquid N applied with herbicides after the crop was planted and a combination of a reduced rate of liquid N plus sidedress manure. Using previous manure analysis, the manure application rate was adjusted to provide the crop with the equivalent amount of N as the normal farm application rate using the 28 percent liquid N. The trial was originally designed to include manure applied prior to planting, but weather prevented including that component in the plots. Evaluation factors include grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and the impact of compaction caused by the manure spreader when sidedressing.

MSU Extension’s Nitrogen in the Environment work group is comprised of Extension educators and specialists. The work group’s goal is to help farmers understand the complexity of maintaining N in the soil available for crop uptake and encourage the adoption of practices that increase the efficiency of N utilization. Information on this trial, and the two other similar field trials the work group is facilitating, will be available in late fall. These field trials are being financially supported by the Corn Marketing Program of Michigan.

Source: Michigan State University

Recent News

Expected Payments on ARC-CO and PLC

After the release of the January WASDE report, the Gardner ARC/PLC Payment Calculator was updated to reflect revised price information for the 2019 and 2020 years. Herein updated estimates of Agricultural Risk Coverage at the County Level (ARC-CO) and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) are presented for corn, soybeans, and wheat. Overall, PLC payments in 2019 are not […]

Managing Stored Grain Through Winter

Managing stored grain throughout the winter is an important part of your grain marketing plan for farm profitability. This winter we are already receiving reports of stored grain going out of condition, which can lower the¬†value and be a hazard to those working around the grain facility. At a minimum, stored grain that has gone […]

Two Trade Deals and a Price Drop

The signing of the Phase 1 trade deal with China and approval in the Senate of the USMCA last week saw two positive developments on the trade front.  Despite some resolution on these trade issues, markets reacted negatively.  The USMCA, while providing stability with two major trading partners, held limited short-term upside potential for corn […]

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now